The path to individualization of infusion therapy for emergency conditions according to the ROSE concept
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31636/prmd.v7i1.5Keywords:
Infusion therapy, trauma, sepsis, emergency fluid resuscitationAbstract
The article is devoted to the role of intravenous fluid therapy in conditions of impaired fluid homeostasis, which often occur during major surgical interventions and critical conditions, such as sepsis and trauma. The importance of adequate fluid administration to maintain cellular homeostasis, as well as the management of conditions associated with hypovolemia and hemodynamic disturbances, is described. It is noted that, despite numerous studies, the topic of optimal fluid management strategies remains controversial, with potential risks of adverse effects of excessive fluid administration on clinical outcomes.
The concept of liquid resuscitation ROSE is presented, which includes four stages: resuscitation, optimization, stabilization and evacuation. This concept will assist physicians in making decisions about fluid therapy management. Different types of fluids are reviewed, including balanced solutions and the multifunctional hyperosmolar solution Reosorbilact, and the importance of individualizing therapy based on the needs of each patient is emphasized. The importance of the need for careful monitoring and control of fluid balance is emphasized to avoid complications and ensure improved clinical outcomes
Downloads
References
1. Edwards MR, Mythen MG. Fluid therapy in critical illness. Extreme Physiology & Medicine [Internet]. 2014 Sep 29;3(1):E16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-7648-3-16
2. Hoste EA, Maitland K, Brudney CS, Mehta R, Vincent JL, Yates D, et al. Four phases of intravenous fluid therapy: a conceptual model. British Journal of Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2014 Nov;113(5):740–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu300
3. Myburgh JA, Mythen MG. Resuscitation Fluids. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2013 Sep 26;369(13):1243–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1208627
4. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Critical Care Medicine [Internet]. 2013 Feb;41(2):580–637. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af
5. Marik PE, Monnet X, Teboul JL. Hemodynamic parameters to guide fluid therapy. Annals of Intensive Care [Internet]. 2011 Mar 21;1(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-1-1
6. Chowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DN. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte® 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. [Internet]. 2012 Jul;256(1):18-24. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256be72.
7. Sánchez M, Jiménez-Lendínez M, Cidoncha M, Asensio MJ, Herrero E, Collado A, et al. Comparison of Fluid Compartments and Fluid Responsiveness in Septic and Non-Septic Patients. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care [Internet]. 2011 Nov;39(6):1022–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x1103900607
8. Malbrain MLNG, Marik PE, Witters I, Cordemans C, Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, et al. Fluid overload, de-resuscitation, and outcomes in critically ill or injured patients: a systematic review with suggestions for clinical practice. Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia [Internet]. 2014 Nov 28;46(5):361–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5603/ait.2014.0060
9. Marik PE. Iatrogenic salt water drowning and the hazards of a high central venous pressure. Annals of Intensive Care [Internet]. 2014 Jun 21;4(1):21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-014-0021-0
10. Malbrain M, Van Regenmortel N. Fluid overload is not only of cosmetic concern (Part I): Exploring a new hypothesis. ICU Management and Practice. 2012;12(1):30-33.
11. Messmer AS, Dill T, Müller M, Pfortmueller CA. Active fluid de-resuscitation in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2023 Mar;109:89–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2023.01.009
12. Magder S. Volume and its relationship to cardiac output and venous return. Critical Care [Internet]. 2016 Sep 10;20(1):271. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1438-7
13. Miller TE, Roche AM, Mythen M. Fluid management and goal-directed therapy as an adjunct to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie [Internet]. 2014 Nov 13;62(2):158–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0266-y
14. Malbrain MLNG, Langer T, Annane D, Gattinoni L, Elbers P, Hahn RG, et al. Intravenous fluid therapy in the perioperative and critical care setting: Executive summary of the International Fluid Academy (IFA). Annals of Intensive Care [Internet]. 2020 May 24;10(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00679-3
15. Acheampong A, Vincent JL. A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. Critical Care [Internet]. 2015 Dec;19(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0970-1
16. De Oliveira FSV, Freitas FGR, Ferreira EM, de Castro I, Bafi AT, de Azevedo LCP, et al. Positive fluid balance as a prognostic factor for mortality and acute kidney injury in severe sepsis and septic shock. Journal of Critical Care [Internet]. 2015 Feb;30(1):97–101. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.09.002
17. Silva JM, de Oliveira AMR, Nogueira FAM, Vianna PMM, Pereira Filho MC, Dias LF, et al. The effect of excess fluid balance on the mortality rate of surgical patients: a multicenter prospective study. Critical Care [Internet]. 2013 Dec 10;17(6):R288. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13151
18. Marik PE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Bittner EA, Sahatjian J, Hansell D. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Medicine [Internet]. 2017 Jan 27;43(5):625–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4675-y
19. Cordemans C, De laet I, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Martin G, et al. Aiming for a negative fluid balance in patients with acute lung injury and increased intra-abdominal pressure: a pilot study looking at the effects of PAL-treatment. Annals of Intensive Care [Internet]. 2012 Jul 5;2(S1):S15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-s1-s15
20. Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory Shock. Finfer SR, Vincent JL, editors. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1726–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1208943
21. Vincent JL. “Let’s Give Some Fluid and See What Happens”versus the “Mini-fluid Challenge.” Anesthesiology [Internet]. 2011 Sep 1;115(3):455–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e318229a521
22. Bennett VA, Vidouris A, Cecconi M. Effects of Fluids on the Macro- and Microcirculations. Critical Care [Internet]. 2018 Mar 20;22(1):74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-1993-1
23. Malbrain ML, Wong A, Nasa P, Ghosh S, editors. Rational Use of Intravenous Fluids in Critically Ill Patients [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2024 [Cite 2 June. 2024]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42205-8
24. Cordemans C, De laet I, Van Regenmortel N, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Huber W, et al. Fluid management in critically ill patients: the role of extravascular lung water, abdominal hypertension, capillary leak, and fluid balance. Annals of Intensive Care [Internet]. 2012 Jul 5;2(S1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2110-5820-2-s1-s1
25. Malbrain MLNG, Van Regenmortel N, Saugel B, De Tavernier B, Van Gaal PJ, Joannes-Boyau O, et al. Principles of fluid management and stewardship in septic shock: it is time to consider the four D’s and the four phases of fluid therapy. Annals of Intensive Care [Internet]. 2018 May 22;8(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0402-x
26. Annane D. Effects of Fluid Resuscitation With Colloids vs Crystalloids on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Presenting With Hypovolemic Shock. JAMA [Internet]. 2013 Nov 6;310(17):1809-1817. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280502
27. Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, et al. Hydroxyethyl Starch or Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Intensive Care. New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1901–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1209759
28. Nahaichuk1 VI, Kozynets HP, Sharipova VKh, Chirimpey О, Tuleubaev B. The first results of the international multicenter clinical study RheoSTAT-CP0669 on the effectiveness and safety of infusion solution Rheosorbilact® in the complex treatment of patients with burns [Pershi rezulʹtaty mizhnarodnoho bahatotsentrovoho klinichnoho doslidzhennya RheoSTAT-CP0669 shchodo efektyvnosti ta bezpeky infuziynoho rozchynu Reosorbilakt® u kompleksnomu likuvanni vid opikovoyi khvoroby]. Infusion and Chemotherapy [Internet] 2023;4:5-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32902/2663-0338-2023-4-5-12 [In Ukrainian]
29. Sharipova VKh, Beridze S, Pidmurniak OO, Shanazarov NA, Kobeliatskyi YuYu, Koshlya VІ, Peev SB, et al. The first data on international multicenter clinical study RheoSTAT-CP0620 on the efficacy and safety of Rheosorbilact® infusion in therapy of sepsis. Infusion and Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2022;2: 11-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32902/2663-0338-2022-2-11-20
30. Feshchenko YI, Beridze S., Hoa Dinh Thi, Molodtsov VY, Gumeniuk MI, Gogoreliani N, Sattarov HI, et al. The first data on international multicenter clinical study RheoSTAT-CP0698 on the efficacy and safety of Rheosorbilact®infusion in therapy of pneumonia. Infusion and Chemotherapy [Internet]. 2021;1:18-21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32902/2663-0338-2021-1-5-14
31. Kovalenko OM. Treatment of the burn shock on a specialized stage [Likuvannya opikovoho shoku na spetsializovanomu etapi]. Klinichna khirurhiia [Internet]. 2019 August;86(8):55-58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26779/2522-1396.2019.08.55 [In Ukrainian]
32. Pascual JL, Ferri LE, Seely AJE, Campisi G, Chaudhury P, Giannias B, et al. Hypertonic Saline Resuscitation of Hemorrhagic Shock Diminishes Neutrophil Rolling and Adherence to Endothelium and Reduces In Vivo Vascular Leakage. Annals of Surgery [Internet]. 2002 Nov;236(5):634–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200211000-00014
33. Loskutov OA, Malysh IR, Zhrzheblovsʹka LV. Review of the European guidelines for the treatment of massive bleeding and coagulopathies after trauma [Ohlyad Yevropeysʹkoyi nastanovy z likuvannya masyvnykh krovotech ta koahulopatiy pislya travmy]. Acute and emergency conditions in the practice [Internet]. 2018; 1(70): 5-13. Available from: https://urgent.com.ua/uploads/issues/2018/1(70)/oins18-1_5-13_2c51cc3f4c405af6a31a021ea418ed34.pdf [In Ukrainian]
34. Kang JH, Jang M, Seo SJ, Choi A, Shin D, Seo S, et al. Mechanobiological Adaptation to Hyperosmolarity Enhances Barrier Function in Human Vascular Microphysiological System. Advanced Science [Internet]. 2023 Feb 19;10(13). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206384
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
